MINUTES

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 - 6:00 p.m.

 

 

CALL TO ORDER

 

The regular meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency of the City of Highland was called to order at 6:01 p.m. by Mayor Lilburn at the Donahue Council Chambers, 27215 Base Line, Highland, California.

 

The invocation was given by Reverend Wayne Reynolds of Immanuel Baptist Church and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Pack 24, Second Year Weeblos.

 

ROLL CALL

 

Present:          McCallon, Scott, Timmer, Mayor Lilburn

Absent:           Jones

 

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

 

Mr. Jake Spoor, President of the Highland Area Chamber of Commerce, gave the Semi-Annual Presentation. 

 

Mayor Lilburn presented a proclamation proclaiming Highland a community in support of the Relay for Life to be held on May 31 and June 1, 2008.

 

Mayor Lilburn presented Jose Robles with a Community Spirit Award for his dedicated work to the community of Highland.

 

COMMUNITY INPUT

 

Mr. Ken Cattrel stated a neighborhood watch program was started in his neighborhood approximately twelve years ago and the purpose was to bring items to the Council’s attention and have them fixed.  To this day, the same items are still in need of repair.  In his neighborhood, there are loud parties being held on the weekends and the city’s current ordinance does not state what can be done to resolve this from occurring.   The City of Rialto has an ordinance stating what can be done to resolve the noise including citations.  He would like the City to update their noise ordinance. 

 

City Manager Hughes stated the City Attorney’s office has been currently working on updating the noise ordinance.  It will be brought forward to the Public Safety Subcommittee in the near future.


Ms. Annette Mendenall stated she is requesting the use of the community center for the Relay for Life event. The event will include a ceremony honoring cancer survivors and will conclude with a fight back ceremony.  It will also include a 24 hour walk, entertainment, games, kid’s camp and a fly over by March Reserve Base. 

 

City Manager Hughes stated staff will work with Ms. Mendenhall as the event will need a special event permit.

 

Ms. Rebecca Bloomfield stated she is the representative for Assemblyman Anthony Adams and is present to observe the Council meeting and also would like to introduce herself to Council.

 

CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR

 

A MOTION was made by Councilman McCallon, seconded by Councilman Timmer, to approve the consent calendar as submitted with the exception of Item #6 being pulled for further discussion.  Motion carried on a roll call vote, 4-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Jones being absent and Councilwoman Scott abstaining from Item #9.

 

1.         Waive the Reading of All Ordinances

Waived the reading of all Ordinances in their entirety and read by title only.

 

2.         Minutes - December 11, 2007 City Council Regular Meeting

Approved Minutes as submitted. 

 

3.         Minutes - December 11, 2007 RDA Regular Meeting

Approved Minutes as submitted. 

 

4.         Minutes - January 8, 2008 City Council Regular Meeting

Approved Minutes as submitted. 

 

5.         Minutes - January 8, 2008 RDA Regular Meeting

Approved Minutes as submitted. 

 

7.         Minutes - January 22, 2008 RDA Regular Meeting

Approved Minutes as submitted. 

 

8.         Claim Consideration - Marika Horton

Rejected claim. 

 

9.         Warrant Register

Approved Warrant Register No. 456 for February 12, 2008, in the amount of $2,198,668.06 and Payroll of $140,952.67. 

 

10.       Treasurer’s Report for December 2007

Received and filed Treasurer’s Report for December 2007. 

 

 

11.       Easement Acceptance/26608 Pacific Street - Gina Ruth Dimmit

1.         Accepted the Grant of Easement for Road and Drainage purposes from Gina Ruth Dimmit; and

2.         Directed the City Clerk to record the Grant of Easement. 

 

12.       Notice of Completion – Project No. ola07002 (Bid No. 2007-08) “2007 Slurry Seal”

1.         Accepted Project No. ola07002 (Bid No. 2007-08) “2007 Slurry Seal” as complete;

2.         Authorized the Mayor to sign the Notice of Completion; and

3.         Directed the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. 

 


13.       Award of Bid Number 2007-17 “ELC Furniture” for the Highland Sam Racadio Library and Environmental Learning Center to Goforth & Marti dba G/M Business Interiors

Awarded Bid Number 2007-17 “ELC Furniture” for the Highland Sam Racadio Library and Environmental Learning Center to Goforth & Marti dba G/M Business Interiors.

 

14.       Award of Bid Number 2007-19 “Recycled Wood Bench” for the Highland Sam Racadio Library and Environmental Learning to Lepo-Works

Awarded Bid Number 2007-19 “Recycled Wood Bench” for the Highland Sam Racadio Library and Environmental Learning Center to Lepo-Works.

 

ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

 

6.         Minutes - January 22, 2008 City Council Regular Meeting

 

Councilwoman Scott stated Item 12 of the minutes are incomplete.  She has requested a copy of the tape and will send a memorandum regarding the notes taken from the tape.

 

Mayor Lilburn stated Council will take no action at this time and this item will be added to the next regularly scheduled Council meeting.

 

CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING

 

15.       Mid-Term Update of the Five-Year Implementation Plan (2005-2009) Highland Redevelopment Project Area No. 1

 

Community Development Director Jaquess stated this is the Mid-Term Update for the Redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan.  This is a five-year plan that was originally adopted in 2004 and will run until 2009.  Every cycle that we have had this, we had a Mid-Term report prepared and presented to Council to bring everyone up to date on what’s been going on with the Redevelopment Agency.  Tonight we have, William Kelly, who works for Urban Futures.  He did the bulk of the work in preparing this report along with staff input.  He would like to turn the presentation over to Mr. Kelly.


Mr. Kelly stated with staff’s outline, this comes in accordance with state laws that you have to at least once during a five-year time span, do a public hearing to review the activities of the plan.  As indicated, the city adopted the plan in 2004 and has a 2009 status.  The report in front of you this evening was prepared in consistent with the state law and was noticed legally as required by state law.  He wants to point out that the city will need to be in preparation of a new five-year plan for the time period of 2009-2014.  At the end of the public hearing, Council will have a chance for comments, questions or changes.  Staff is recommending the adoption of the resolution located in the packet.  He would like to briefly highlight some of the important elements of this plan; otherwise it’s a pretty dry document.  From a fiscal point of view, the Agency is doing extremely well in terms of revenue.  That is fortunate because you sold a bond raising significant funds to pay for large number of public improvements the city claims to do in the future.   These would include the Police Station, Base Line Bridge Improvements, Greenspot Bride Improvements and other improvements.  He does want to note on table five that we are projecting potential slight decline in tax increments given the economy and the housing market slump.  The city won’t be rising as fast as you had in previous years, although the city will maintain a positive cash balance.  It is the recommendation to be more conservative in the numbers and being optimistic.  At the end of the plan, the city will still have sufficient dollars to do many of the important projects.  The city also has sufficient dollars in the low and moderate income plan.  That is the 20% set aside funds.  The city is spending a lot of this money on the single family grant rehab program and first time homebuyers.  These programs are very successful activities and the city is spending about $1.4 million each year for that program.  On page 19, eight specific projects are listed that are still being worked on; very important projects, some in conjunction with Chamber of Commerce as noted this evening. Lastly, the housing funds in terms of the city’s deficient or your positive for set aside housing and in the case of low and moderate, the city is good, however, in the case of very low the city is a little bit under and has a deficit.  This doesn’t mean to panic; it means the city will have to concentrate the low and moderate income dollars to attempt to correct those deficits in future years.  Those deficits will be readjusted in the new five-year plan that will be looked at from 2009-2014.  It is the conclusion of the city’s consultant and talking with staff who was very, very helpful in putting this together, that this Agency is consistent with the state’s goals and objectives and this report is consistent with state law.  No specific changes are being recommended at this point and time.

 

Agency Member McCallon stated table six deals with LMI funds.  He noticed it shows that we are going to be spending $1.4 million in the last two years, each year, but historically we have not done that.

 

Mr. Kelly stated that is correct.  Staff is suggesting and this will go through the budget process that these programs are so successful that they are recommending the appropriation of those funds.  Of course, these are estimates in the future years. It doesn’t bind the Council appropriately.  These are recommendations for the years to the end of the five-year plan.  As part of the budget process, Council will refine those more in detail.

 

Agency Member McCallon asked are these capital projects that are listed, are they rehab apartments or what are the $601 million insurance capital projects.

 

Community Development Director Jaquess stated it is combination of rehab of apartments where we would be purchasing covenants for existing apartment buildings and also single family homes rehab.

 

Agency Member Timmer asked have we had any positive comments from complex owners.

 

Community Development Director Jaquess stated we actually have been contacted by three or four apartment project owners who have expressed some interest.  We are currently working with the first one with our attorney to actually put together a proposal to take back to the owner.

 

Chairwoman Lilburn stated we also have had some interest from people who have been working on projects who would like to come in and buy those as well and take them over too. 

 

Agency Member Timmer stated the reason he asked the question is the deficit we have in very low income and the intent for the program is to address that deficiency at some point.  We are working on it is what is really being said.

 

Mr. Kelly stated very low income category is the hardest for most cities to comply with.  He didn’t want Council to panic because the city is in a deficit but the city will get into trouble.  Working on it is the important thing.

 

A MOTION was made by Agency Member McCallon, seconded by Agency Member Timmer, to approve and adopt Resolution No. RDA2008-002, the Mid-Term Update of the Five-Year Implementation Plan (2005-2009).  Motion carried, 4-0, with Vice Chairman Jones being absent.

 

RESOLUTION NO. RDA2008-002

A RESOLUTION OF THE HIGHLAND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

ADOPTING THE MIDTERM UPDATE OF THE FIVE-YEAR

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2005-2009 FOR THE

HIGHLAND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT


CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LEGISLATIVE

 

16.       The Planning Center’s Greenspot Village and Marketplace Specific Plan EIR Professional Service Agreement Amendment No. 1 - Budget Augmentation / Scope of Work Change / Project Schedule Extension (City Council Agreement approved on July 11, 2006.)

 

City Planner Mainez gave a brief review of the staff report.

 

Councilwoman Scott asked how this relates to the action taken at the previous Council meeting where Council voted to give the contract to the Planning Center.  Council has agreed to do so much and the developers were to contribute as well. 

 

City Manager Hughes stated that is a different issue.  This is dealing with the entire project on private property. 

 

Councilman McCallon stated it is not clear in the staff report if the developer pays all the costs.

 

City Planner Mainez stated that is correct.  There is an existing deposit in house and $62,000 has been spent on this project.

 

A MOTION was made by Councilman Timmer, seconded by Councilwoman Scott, to:

 

1.         Approve the Planning Centers Budget Augmentation in the amount of “$241,889.00 ($255,840 with optional traffic tasks)” for a total “not to exceed” amount of $352,056.00 (366,007.00 with optional traffic tasks);

 2.        Approve the Planning Center’s Scope of Work changes required as a result of revisions to the Greenspot Village and Marketplace Specific Plan which includes substantial changes to the Project description including Project acreage, and the inclusion of new Technical Consultants previously under the contract to the Specific Plan Developers (Amendment No. 1); and

3.         Approve the Planning Center’s revised Environmental Processing Schedule subject to streamlining efforts where possible.

 

Motion carried, 4-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Jones being absent.


17.       Exclusive Negotiation Agreement Between the Highland Redevelopment Agency and Vestar Highland, GV

 

Community Development Director Jaquess gave a brief review of the staff report.

 

Agency Member McCallon stated he has a problem with the Agency doing this.  He does not believe the government should be in the middle of buying land for someone and then turning it over to them for a project.  He thinks it is better left to the marketplace to allow whomever to buy it. 

 

Agency Member Scott stated she has concerns with if the county wants to sell and they have set a price, why is the Council getting involved. 

 

Community Development Director Jaquess stated the reason the city has made a decision to get involved is because we believe we have the ability to establish a prior right over the private market to purchase the property.  In any case, we would have to purchase the property at appraised value because the county is required to sell it at an appraised value but the belief was that if the city actually acted as an intermediary in the process, we would be able to ensure that the outcome was consistent with the city’s objectives for the commercial development of the Golden Triangle. 

 

Agency Member Scott asked all costs, including the $15,000, would be reimbursed to the city by the developer.

 

Community Development Director Jaquess yes, the developers will be submitting a check to the city in the amount of $165,000.  These funds would be on deposit for us to charge time against.  Of that $165,000, $15,000 will be retained by the city.

 

City Manager Hughes stated he would like to clarify this isn’t the city, it is the Redevelopment Agency.  This is an Agency action.

 

Agency Member Timmer stated he is in agreement with Agency Member McCallon.  His philosophy has always been government does not belong in real estate business.  He will support this agreement but the Council had a majority vote to move forward and we will.  

 

A MOTION was made by Agency Member Scott, seconded by Chairwoman Lilburn, to approve the proposed Exclusive Negotiation Agreement between the Agency and Vestar Highland, GV.  Motion carried, 3-1, with Agency Member McCallon dissenting and Vice Chairman Jones being absent.


18.       Amend Chapter 5.20 of Title 5 of the Highland Municipal Code to Implement the Provisions of AB 2987 (State Video Franchises)

 

City Manager Hughes gave a brief review of the staff report.

 

A MOTION was made by Councilman McCallon, seconded by Councilman Timmer, to adopt Ordinance No. 321 amending Chapter 5.20 of the Highland Municipal Code.  Motion carried, 4-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Jones being absent.

 

City Clerk Hughes introduced Ordinance No. 321:

 

ORDINANCE NO. 321

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND AMENDING CHAPTER 5.20 OF TITLE 5 OF THE HIGHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO ARTICLE II THEREOF A NEW DIVISION VII RELATING TO SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO HOLDERS OF STATE VIDEO FRANCHISES

 

which title was read. 

 

19.       Update on Public Opinion Survey on Funding Alternatives for Public Safety Services

 

Administrative Analyst Rissmiller gave a brief review of the staff report.  Part of the survey was to include if a new source of revenue is necessary, the survey could find out what the community thought about the different ways to achieve this.  What was identified during the discussion was there is a number of different ways for the revenue to be raised if it is necessary.  The issue that was raised is the company is not comfortable surveying all the different methods.  They termed it as tax fatigue if they were to survey all the methods.  They would like to request Council to narrow down the methods that are acceptable to Council, therefore, they would only survey a limited number of the methods. 

 

Councilman Timmer stated for clarification the five methods are sales tax, utility tax, parcel tax, assessment district and a general tax.

 

Administrative Analyst Rissmiller stated correct.

 

Councilman Timmer stated as for the sales tax method; we do not have enough businesses in town to generate a number and the utility tax he never has supported. The parcel tax has worked, we have multiple assessment districts but he feels more comfortable with a general tax with an advisory method that goes along with it.  He would support the one choice of general tax.

 

Mayor Lilburn stated she would support the choice as well.

 

Councilman McCallon stated he agrees.

 

Councilwoman Scott stated she would like to have more information before she makes a decision. 

 

Administrative Analyst Rissmiller stated the survey will establish if a new tax is necessary for a new revenue source, how much, how long, those types of issues.  What Council is being asked to do is narrow down the methods of new revenue.  The survey should be conducted by the middle of March.  Direction from Council consists of asking the company to conduct a survey regarding the general tax with an advisory measure.

 

City Manager Hughes stated we also should look at the straight parcel tax similar to what we do with the paramedic tax as an option.

 

Mayor Lilburn stated the direction from Council is to conduct a survey for the parcel tax and the general tax with the advisory measure.

 

20.       Update on SANBAG, SCAG, Omnitrans, Work Program and Regional/Legislative Issues/Development Issues/Subcommittees/AB 1234 Updates

 

Councilman McCallon stated the new director of SCAG plans to have satellite offices in each subregion of SCAG.  He also plans to have an employee at each subregion to better collaborate with the subregions.  SCAG will also be holding their first workshop for the Regional Comprehensive Plan.  This is the first of four workshops.  It is a workshop to help set priorities for SCAG.  It is important for the input to define the draft report and it will also include a list of policies in which the policies will need to be reviewed and prioritized.

 

Mayor Lilburn stated Omnitrans approved the locally preferred alternative route which will be running from Cal State San Bernardino to Loma Linda University.  The SBX will have minimum stops with a dedicated lane to reach the location at a quicker pace.

 

Councilwoman Scott inquired about the bus stop benches as to who determines what style they install.

 

Mayor Lilburn responded ridership.  Ridership determines whether they will install bench, overhang and how much traffic is there.

 

Councilwoman Scott stated she was in Fontana and Rialto and they have very nice metal benches installed at their bus stops.

 

Community Development Director Jaquess stated we are currently designing bus stop areas as part of our landscape design corridor for the Greenspot Road between the freeway and Boulder. 

 

Councilman Timmer asked if we will actually be changing the streetscape in the sense of having special indentations for buses or just the architectural furniture that will be installed.


Community Development Director Jaquess stated in terms of Greenspot Road it is a little bit of both.

 

City Engineer Wong stated the selection of the bus pull out location has gone through quite a bit of discussion among staff and Omnitrans. Omnitrans has recommended certain locations for bus stops and bus pull outs in the Golden Triangle.  The locations finalized on the master plan are locations where staff feels there will be a lot of ridership in front of major stores such as the Wal-Mart development. 

 

Mayor Lilburn stated she has concerns with having a bus stop where shopping carts are just left there and then you have an eye sore of shopping carts.

 

Community Development Director Jaquess stated the issues of shopping carts will be the subject of some specific conditioning for any project in that area.

 

Councilman Timmer stated there was a public meeting of the R2C meeting and a recommendation was presented to the committee.  Most people were pleased with the recommendation.  The committee recommended moving forward with a recommendation to the Planning Commission to start the process as well as to do away with the special conditional use permit process.  We also recommended the R2C Committee be terminated at this point.

 

            Mayor Lilburn stated the R2C Base Line Corridor Ad Hoc has been disbanded.

 

Councilman McCallon attended the League of California Cities Annual Conference Planning meeting on January 30 to assist in the planning of the League’s Annual Conference to be held in September. 

 

21.       San Bernardino International Airport Authority and IVDA

 

            None

 

ANNOUNCEMENTS

 

            None

 

CLOSED SESSION

 

At 7:19 p.m., the City Council and Redevelopment Agency convened into closed session regarding the following:

 

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9(a)

Town of Apple Valley et al. v. County of San Bernardino

Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. KC049711


CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION 54956.9(a)

City of Highland v. McCarty, et al.

San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCISS130282

 


CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the following property:

Property:                                APN 1192-421-01 (27167 Base Line)

Negotiating parties:              Joseph Hughes, City of Highland

Sharon Davis, County of San Bernardino

Under negotiation:                Instruction to City’s negotiator concerning price and terms of payment.

 

At 7:34 p.m., the City Council and Redevelopment Agency convened into open session, with Mayor Pro Tem Jones being absent, making no announcements.

 

ADJOURN

 

There being no further business, Mayor Lilburn adjourned the meeting at 7:36 p.m. in memory of Mr. Greg Benge and Mr. Leo Green.

 

 

Submitted by:                                                            Approved by:

 

 

 

____________________________                     _________________________________

Betty Hughes, CMC                                                  Penny Lilburn

City Clerk                                                                   Mayor